Thursday 2 December 2010

Reading 11, 2.1 Correlation Analysis

The references refer to the CFA text book.

2 Correlation Analysis


2.1 Scatter Plots

A scatter plot is a graph that shows the relationship between the observations for two data series in two dimensions.
Included 2 scatter plots related to BHP. Data is included below.
Note that I use a log scale to ensure ease of comparison.
Logarithmic scale. 
On a logarithmic scale or graph, comparable percentage changes in the value of an investment, index, or average appear to be similar. However, the actual underlying change in value may be significantly different.
For example, a stock whose price increases during the year from $25 to $50 a share has the same percentage change as a stock whose price increases from $100 to $200 a share.
On a logarithmic scale, it's irrelevant that the dollar value of the second stock is four times the value of the first.
Similarly, the percentage change in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) as it rose from 1,000 to 2,000 is comparable to the percentage change when it moved from 4,000 to 8,000.


 


2.2 Correlation Analysis

Scatter diagrams depicts the relationship between 2 data series.
Correlation analysis expresses the same relationship using a single number – Term is correlation coefficient.
CC measures direction AND extent of linear relationship.
CC is between 1 and -1.
A CC of >0 to 1 indicates a positive linear relationship.
NB: If CC is 1, it means that the relationship increases at the same rate. It does not necessarily means that if Variable A increase by one unit, Variable B must increase by one unit. (It could mean that!)
What it does mean that the relationship is consistent, e.g. if A increases by 1, variable B consistently increases by ½ for example.

2.3 Practical Example – BHP revenue vs Dividends per ordinary share - Correlation coefficient

Included below 2 examples using BHP data. You can check your answers for other examples using the following web site: http://easycalculation.com/statistics/correlation.php


1. Data
Year
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006

Revenue US $m
52798
50211
59473
47473
39099

Dividends per ordinary share - declared in respect of the period (US sent)
87
82
56
38.5
32


2. Calculation
Year
Revenue $
Dividends
Cross product
Squared deviations Revenue
Squared deviations Dividends

2010
52798
87
83,342.88
8,923,363.84
778.41

2009
50211
82
9,164.58
160,160.04
524.41

2008
59473
56
-29,952.82
93,358,108.84
9.61

2007
47473
38.5
48,158.68
5,465,308.84
424.36

2006
39099
32
290,289.78
114,742,659.24
734.41

Average
49810.8
59.1


Covariance
Sum
401,003.10
222,649,600.80
2,471.20

(N-1)
4.00

Answer
100,250.78


Variance
Sum Squared deviations
222,649,600.80
2,471.20

(N-1)
4.00
4.00

Answer
55,662,400.20
617.80


Standard deviation
7,460.72
24.86


Coefficient Correlation
1.Covariance
100,250.78

2.Standard deviation X Standard deviation
185,440.64

Answer
0.54









2.4 Practical example – BHP revenue vs Earnings per ordinary share - Correlation coefficient


1. Data
Year
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Revenue US $m
52798
50211
59473
47473
39099
Earnings per ordinary share (diluted) (US sent)
227.8
105.4
274.8
228.9
172.4

2. Calculation
Year
Revenue $
Dividends
Cross product
Squared deviations Revenue
Squared deviations Dividends
2010
52798
227.80
77,487.97
8,923,363.84
672.88
2009
50211
105.40
-38,603.29
160,160.04
9,304.53
2008
59473
274.80
704,760.87
93,358,108.84
5,320.24
2007
47473
228.90
-63,214.11
5,465,308.84
731.16
2006
39099
172.40
315,569.63
114,742,659.24
867.89
Average
49810.8
201.86
Covariance
Sum
      996,001.06
   222,649,600.80
          16,896.71
(N-1)
                 4.00
Answer
     249,000.27
Variance
Sum Squared deviations
222,649,600.80
         16,896.71
(N-1)
                        4.00
                     4.00
Answer
     55,662,400.20
            4,224.18
Standard deviation
               7,460.72
                 64.99
Coefficient Correlation
1. Covariance
      249,000.27
2. Standard deviation X Standard deviation
      484,899.87
Answer (1/2)
                   0.51




No comments:

Post a Comment